Well, I was finally able to sign in over at ABC......after several attempts.  The screen came up black several times, but then suddenly it came up with the pop up box where I could type in my info, still that didn't work after several trys.....but I didn't give up, eventually I got in.  That place over there is so missed up and I think not letting the Canadians vote is dumb.....for many reasons.  I didn't vote last week, but I wanted to option to if I wanted......not sure if it will work next time....So glad that we have our little home here.

KOS......are you stil having log in problems over here?  It is Frustrating.............and we miss you..

eastcoast1 wrote:

CEK,
Enjoyed reading your post.  Whils I agree with you for the most part, I still have lingering doubts about how all of this transpired.  I love some of the girls on DWTS, Emma, Kym, Sharna, Jenna, Witney. Obviously and for whatever reason, I don't care for Peta. Never did, even before the whole Maks, Meryl thing.  There is just something about her that doesn't ring true to me.  Stictly intuition on my part. So, do I wish her and Maks a lifetime of happiness, no, not really, more accurately, I don't care about their relationship at all.  In fact, I would guess that peta will not be endgame for Maks, there will be others, of this I am certain. Just a matter of time.

Going forward, I guess this is no longer a M&M ship is it?  What are we now exactly? i enjoy the variety of subjects that we all bring to the table. I wish we heard more from Booky, Oliie and some of the others who seem to have drifted off.  We are all so unique in our own way, we could have some really good talks about a multitude of topics.  Just saying....



 

EClong, while many of us don't wave the MnM flag anymore, I do believe some may still hope MnM get together sometime down the road.  To me that is okay and it is okay to post their feelings on that.  I also agree that there are so many subjects that we can talk about.  It doesn't even need to be about dancing.  I think of this site as a FriendSHIP site where everything and everyone is welcome and that all subjects and opinions are welcome.   I enjoy reading peoples views about whatever it is that is on their minds. I hold no "hard feelings" towards anyone or whatever it is that they wish to express.  That is what friends do.....and that is what this "ship" is to me.  We all see this site differently and that is fine.  I do wish that Booky, Ollie, Gunner,  Tango and few others not seen in awhile would show up and post......but I leave that up to them.  HOWEVER.......they are missed....at least by me.

Last edited by LuvSeason18 (3/18/2015 11:34 am)

LuvSeason18 wrote:

April..........................

I am going to repost this from me, too, April.   I've been thinking about you guys so much this morning because it seems to me if you had a little good news....you would pop in for a second to share it with us.

So please know our prayers are with you.  And we yearn for some news....good or not.  So we can share your burden.
 

Good morning, ladies, from the left coast!  It is sunny and breezy today---winds from the west--so moderate temps are predicted today...about mid-70's....so YEA!!

Hope everyone is having a great day!

CEK40 wrote:

’Dancing’ judges talk showmances, partner patterns and more



It seems like some pros on the show always get good partners, like Derek Hough (Julianne’s brother). And some pros seem to always get partners who are more of a challenge. Why is that?Hough: I don’t know how the casting process works. We’re not a part of it. … I know there are certain personalities that work well with a certain kind of celebrity or a certain kind of personality. I know that Tony (Dovolani) is nurturing and gets the person to take care of. And there’s always a spicy (dynamic) going on between like Val (Chmerkovskiy and his partner). There definitely is a pattern but I think it’s more personality-driven rather than ability-driven.

 What is it about when fans and the media pick up on the chemistry between partners? People were rooting for Maks (Chmerkovskiy) and (former partner) Meryl Davis to become a couple. This happens a lot.

 Hough: It’s the most vulnerable position you can be in without being in a relationship. You’re sweating. You’re extremely close. You’re vulnerable. You can either break down or celebrate at any given moment. That’s what a relationship is and it is physical because you’re dancing. … A lot of couples do get together (romantically).

 Tonioli: To make it actually work and make it effective there has to be this total trust and abandon. To make a performance absolutely stand out there has to be that connection. Two people become one. Sometimes a little romance may blossom.

 Inaba: I was rooting for Maks and Meryl to get together.

 Hough: And that was the most vulnerable we’ve ever seen him.

 Tonioli: He let go. She broke him. It’s like breaking a stallion.

 

 Loved what all three but especially Bruno says here.  That is a great analogy!  Maybe it was, in fact, scary for Maks to feel that vulnerable.  Never happened before.